Touch Dna with Nano Forensics: A Forerunner in The New Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37506/cphp6h90Keywords:
DNA, nano forensics, touch, criminal, justice.Abstract
The integration of touch DNA analysis with nano-forensic technology presents a revolutionary advancement in the field
of criminology, offering a new frontier in forensic investigations. Touch DNA refers to the genetic material left behind
from even the slightest contact with an object or surface, making it a valuable tool for identifying individuals involved in
a crime scene. Traditionally, the collection and analysis of such minute samples posed challenges in terms of sensitivity
and accuracy. However, recent advancements in nanotechnology have significantly enhanced the capability to detect and
analyse trace amounts of DNA with unprecedented precision.
Nano-forensic technology employs nanoscale materials and devices that can magnify the analysis of biological evidence
at the molecular level, improving the detection of DNA from touch samples. These innovations enable forensic experts
to extract, amplify, and sequence DNA from surfaces previously deemed too contaminated or insufficient for traditional
methods. The development of nanoparticles, biosensors, and nanochips has led to the creation of more efficient,
faster, and cost-effective DNA analysis tools, which are particularly useful in criminal investigations where evidence
may be scarce or compromised.
Methodologically, this study evaluates DNA recovery rates across various surfaces (e.g., non-porous vs. porous materials)
and compares extraction techniques, highlighting the superiority of silica-coated MNPs (92% recovery) over conventional
methods (65–72%). Nano-assisted PCR and microfluidic systems reduced processing time to under 1 hour while
maintaining high precision (99.1% allele calling accuracy). Emerging technologies like CRISPR-based enrichment and
nanopore sequencing further address challenges in mixed DNA profiles and inhibitor-rich samples.Results demonstrate
that nano-forensics enables viable DNA profiling from previously undetectable traces, such as fingerprints on fabrics
or degraded cold-case evidence. Field applications showed a 78% success rate in generating actionable leads from lowtemplate
DNA. The integration of artificial intelligence and portable nano-devices promises real-time, on-site forensic
analysis, transforming criminal investigations.
This paper concludes that nano-forensics not only overcomes the limitations of traditional touch DNA analysis but
also sets a new standard for forensic science, offering unparalleled resolution in justice-driven applications. Future
directions include standardization and cost reduction to facilitate global adoption.
References
Nanotechnology Timeline | National Nanotechnology
Initiative [Internet]. Available from: https://www.
nano.gov/timeline
2. Persistence of touch DNA for analysis | National
Institute of Justice [Internet]. National Institute of
Justice. Available from: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/
articles/persistence-touch-dna-analysis
3. Ali NBS. The Application of nanotechnology in
criminology and forensic Sciences. International
Journal for Electronic Crime Investigation [Internet].
2022 Dec 15;6(4):13–8. Available from: https://doi.
org/10.54692/ijeci.2022.0604112
4. Bhoyar L, Mehar P, Chavali K. An overview of DNA
degradation and its implications in forensic casework.
Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences [Internet].
2024 Mar 15;14(1). Available from: https://doi.
org/10.1186/s41935-024-00389-y
5. Borg T. The role of DNA analysis in forensic science
[Internet]. Alliant International University. Available
from: https://www.alliant.edu/blog/role-of-dnaanalysis-
in-forensic-science
6. Daly DJ, Murphy C, McDermott SD. The transfer of
touch DNA from hands to glass, fabric, and wood.
Forensic Science International Genetics [Internet].
2011 Feb 17;6(1):41–6. Available from: https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.12.016
7. Tozzo P, Mazzobel E, Marcante B, Delicati A,
Caenazzo L. Touch DNA sampling Methods: Efficacy
evaluation and systematic review. International
Journal of Molecular Sciences [Internet]. 2022
Dec 8;23(24):15541. Available from: https://doi.
org/10.3390/ijms232415541
8. Bukyya JL, Tejasvi MLA, Avinash A, P CH, Talwade
P, Afroz MM, et al. DNA Profiling in Forensic Science:
A Review. Global Medical Genetics [Internet]. 2021
May 31;08(04):135–43. Available from: https://doi.
org/10.1055/s-0041-1728689
9. Alketbi SK. Emerging technologies in forensic
DNA analysis. Deleted Journal [Internet]. 2024
Jan 1;1(1):10007. Available from: https://doi.
org/10.70322/plfs.2024.10007
10. Garg R. Importance of DNA forensics in criminal
investigation and trials - iPleaders [Internet].
iPleaders. 2022. Available from: https://blog.
ipleaders.in/importance-of-dna-forensics-incriminal-
investigation-and-trials/
11. DNA evidence: How it’s done [Internet]. Available
from: https://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/
dna/how.html
12. Van Oorschot RA, Ballantyne KN, Mitchell RJ.
Forensic trace DNA: a review. Investigative Genetics
[Internet]. 2010 Jan 1;1(1):14. Available from: https://
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3012025/
13. Zacher M, Van Oorschot R a H, Handt O, Goray
M. Transfer and persistence of intruder DNA
within an office after reuse by owner. Forensic
Science International Genetics [Internet]. 2024
Aug 28;73:103130. Available from: https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103130
14. Raymond JJ, Van Oorschot RAH, Gunn PR, Walsh
SJ, Roux C. Trace evidence characteristics of DNA: A
preliminary investigation of the persistence of DNA at
crime scenes. Forensic Science International Genetics
[Internet]. 2009 May 2;4(1):26–33. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.04.002
15. Goray M, Eken E, Mitchell RJ, Van Oorschot RAH.
Secondary DNA transfer of biological substances under
varying test conditions. Forensic Science International
Genetics [Internet]. 2009 Jun 10;4(2):62–7. Available
from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.05.001
16. Lowe A, Murray C, Whitaker J, Tully G, Gill P.
The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and
secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals
to inert surfaces. Forensic Science International
[Internet]. 2002 Sep 1;129(1):25–34. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00207-4
17. Whitaker JP, Cotton EA, Gill P. A comparison of
the characteristics of profiles produced with the
AMPFlSTR® SGM PlusTM multiplex system for both
standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA
analysis. Forensic Science International [Internet].
2001 Dec 1;123(2–3):215–23. Available from: https://
doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00557-6
18. Gill P, Sparkes R, Pinchin R, Clayton T, Whitaker
J, Buckleton NJ. Interpreting simple STR mixtures
using allele peak areas. Forensic Science International
[Internet]. 1998 Jan 1;91(1):41–53. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(97)00174-6
19. Is “Touch DNA” precisely the opposite? | Ohio State
Bar Association [Internet]. Available from: https://
www.ohiobar.org/member-tools-benefits/practiceresources/
practice-library-search/practice-library/
is-touch-dna-precisely-the-opposite/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.