A Mixed Method Study: The Role of Physiotherapy in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation: Enhancing Recovery and Improving Quality of Life in Cardiac Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37506/0c5qqk78Keywords:
Cardiovascular disease (CVDs), post-cardiac, Physiotherapy, Evidence-based strategies.Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. While medical advancements
have improved post-cardiac evet survival, the integration of physiotherapy into rehabilitation programs is critical for
optimizing recovery. Studies show that structured cardiac rehabilitation programs incorporating physiotherapy reduce
hospital readmissions by 31% and improve survival rates by 25%. Additionally, patients undergoing physiotherapy report
a 40% improvement in functional capacity and a 35% reduction in depression and anxiety symptoms. This study aims to
evaluate the efficacy of physiotherapy interventions in enhancing cardiovascular function, reducing hospital readmissions
and improving psychological well-being among cardiac patients. A mixed methods approach will be employed, combining
quantitative clinical evaluations and quantitative surveys/ interviews with patients and healthcare provides. Anticipated
outcomes include evidence supporting structured physiotherapy programs as essential components of cardiac rehabilitation,
identification of optimal techniques and recommendations for integrating physiotherapy into standard care protocols. The
findings will contribute to evidence-based strategies for improving long-term patient outcomes and quality of life.
References
1. Anderson L, Thompson DR, Oldridge N, Zwisler
AD, Rees K, Martin N, et al. Exercise-based cardiac
rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2016;(1):CD001800.https://doi.
org/10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3
2. Dibben G, Faulkner J, Oldridge N, Rees K, Thompson
DR, Zwisler AD, et al. Exercise-based cardiac
rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2021;(11):CD001800. http://
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4
3. Rauch B, Davos CH, Doherty P, Saure D, Metzendorf
MI, Salzwedel A, et al. The prognostic effect of cardiac
rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation
and statin therapy: A systematic review and metaanalysis
of randomized and non-randomized studies.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(18):1914-39. http://
doi:10.1177/2047487316671181
4. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases
(CVDs) [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2021 [cited 2024
Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/newsroom/
fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-
(cvds)
5. Anderson L, Taylor RS. Cardiac rehabilitation for
people with heart disease: An overview of Cochrane
systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2014;(12):CD011273.http://doi:10.1002/14651858.
CD011273.pub2
6. Anderson L, Sharp GA, Norton RJ, Dalal H, Dean
SG, Jolly K, et al. Home-based versus centre-based
cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2017;(6):CD007130.http://doi:10.1002/14651858.
CD007130.pub4
7. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe J, Noorani H,
Rees K, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for heart
failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(5):988-96. http://
doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.062
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
